Yeah, but Why? Because we assume that people we lust after and who might lust after us won't show up there. The assumption in intrinsically heterosexist. doesn't follow from the labels 'men' and 'women' unless you're assuming they're heterosexist, cause 'men' isn't necessarily about lust and can be shorthand for 'stands up to pee'. Or possibly 'makes more stinky', though I don't know why. I just have brothers and a sense of smell.

Is having one toilet marked 'disabled' evidence that (a) disabled is a seperate gender (b) disabled is a seperate lust category (c) disabled need different facilities. If c, why assume a and b about the other labels? Because of their other uses, obviously, but.