(no subject)

Date: 2007-09-28 01:03 am (UTC)
though i'm surprised you didn't touch too much on what i'd call postmodernity

Great minds think alike, because I spent all morning while engaged in gainful employment before I read your post thinking about how I hadn't mentioned postmodernity, and why I probably should. Not sure you mean the same thing I did, of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if you did.

or is that where you get too angry at Sapir-Whorf adherents?

The problem with Sapir-Whorf isn't that it's wrong somehow; it isn't. The problem is that it isn't even wrong. I'm only angry at Sapir-Whorf adherents when they believe that it makes some type of claim about empirical reality, and that claim is in contradiction with actual social scientific research.

Btw, do you have/recall any good anti-Derridean essays/books rants? I could only come up with Gasche's, but I'm trying to recall the more newspaper type ones I read

I'm not sure what you mean by "newspaper type." I remember when Derrida died in 2004 (I was in London at the time) and there were a lot of snotty obituaries. I don't think I'd read a book-length anti-Derrida rant, unless it was critiquing him from a feminist or other perspective which I shared to some degree.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

October 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags