Entry tags:
Episode Reactions in Brief
Dollhouse 2x04
Between this and "Epitaph One," I'm really falling in love with Adelle.
Sarah Jane Adventures 3x04
So, has anyone written K-9/Mr. Smith yet?
Between this and "Epitaph One," I'm really falling in love with Adelle.
Sarah Jane Adventures 3x04
So, has anyone written K-9/Mr. Smith yet?
no subject
no subject
no subject
If the task is to try and construct an ethic by which the one action is okay but the other isn't (and I do think the latter is worse and not morally equivalent at all even if I think both are too morally problematic to undertake), then we're on much less firm ground: well, then, Topher got as much consent from Priya as, to his and to his Adelle's knowledge at that point, she was able to give, and would ever be able to give (at least without a level of intervention that only Topher would be able to provide?). Insane!Priya was who Priya was.
While you and I would not consider that sufficient to justify making her an active (although it seems to me there are plenty of Dollhouse watchers who don't seem to think any set of circumstances would be sufficient to allow one to consent to becoming an Active--obviously not a perspective shared by Topher or Adelle), it is something--and the fact remains that while Priya's ability to consent is problematized, this too diminishes Priya's ability to refuse treatment; the only way that Adelle and Topher can provide her with what they truly believe is something she would rationally want is to take insane!Priya's yes as a yes. Insane!Priya is who Priya is.
Whereas Nolan's fundamental eradication of her ability to consent--well, as I said, while I don't think the choice Adelle and Topher made is okay, it's intuitively obvious to me that what Nolan did was infinitely worse, so I'm not sure how good I'll be at articulating the argument to someone who doesn't share that intuition. But Nolan knows that there's an accessible sane!Priya available if he simply stops her medication, and thus that insane!Priya is a diminishment of her mind's default state. He's actively taking away her ability to consent, which is unequivocally a case of rape. To me, what he did was a deep betrayal of Priya's personhood, and thus the worst kind of moral evil, and what Topher and Adelle did wasn't despite still being very morally dicey.
Whereas Adelle's use of Victor isn't, or at least isn't any more so than any use of an Active is--it's simply stealing company property--which made the Rossum representative bringing it up seem deeply weird. Being willing to steal but not be an accomplice to rape doesn't strike me as a particularly incoherent set of values--especially since Adelle has to be okay with theft since part of her job is turning Actives into thieves. It makes me wonder what she has done in her past, especially since I was surprised that Adelle gave into Rossum so easily (when we know from "Epitaph One" that she eventually turns against them for similar reasons, although then it was on a greater scale and here it's just one Active); I would have expected her to much more actively conspire with Topher and/or Boyd.
Which reminds me that I thought Nolan's comment that he never imagined acting out a scenario in which Sierra resisted as deeply odd since he had to know that Adelle would never have authorized such an engagement without extraordinary pressure (of the sort shown in this episode) applied.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
If Topher can make it so that Sierra doesn't suffer from paranoia (which we don't really know that he can, since Priya didn't really), then he should be able to manufacture a paranoia-less facsimile of Priya (whether that would "really" be Priya could be up for debate), I think.
Agreed that forever keeping Priya in a box would be murder, at least under the assumption that the Dollhouse works the way it's supposed to (which of course it doesn't, but Topher and Adelle don't know that).
no subject
no subject
And I suppose that the last possibility is that Adelle just doesn't see insane!Priya as a person, anymore than she sees Sierra as a person. Although at some point ("Epitaph One," probably) I remember Adelle invoking talk of souls, and if souls exist it'd be hard to claim the insane don't have them.
no subject
no subject
It's an abhorrent world view, but it doesn't strike me as obviously incoherent. But I agree that as an explanation, it still doesn't feel to fit Adelle very well. It seems much more likely that she sees insane!Priya as having given sufficient consent prior to understanding how that consent was coerced.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do think there'd be some question as to whether, if Topher imprinted a truly mentally ill Priya with a manufactured version of herself sans that illness, whether that personality would count as an ensouled person are just be equivalent to another imprint. That'd be on top of the question of how meaningful consent could be when gotten out of an imprint that was, in part, manufactured by Topher in the first place.
It's possible, but not likely, that Adelle could see Priya's illness as a diminishment of her soulfullness.
But again, I think the main reason why asking cured!Priya for consent never occurs to Adelle and Topher is because they firmly see curing her and her becoming a doll as a single act. So the question becomes, is insane!Priya able to consent to her cure (with her becoming a doll a necessary result of being cured). If not, then she's condemned to being insane forever, as far as Adelle and Topher know. So they might see that, in that backwards morality sort of way of theirs, as a humanitarian imperative to loosen the rules somewhat.
no subject
Otherwise, I'm not sure we're getting anywhere. I'm sticking with my original, "Adelle thinks stalker's behavior is worse than hers because he's getting something out of it." And maybe also because he conned her into doing something to Priya that she wouldn't have done to a healthy person, and Adelle doesn't like being conned. But as far as turning someone into an active without their consent, the actions are identical.
no subject
no subject
I really can't fathom how your own privilege could have anything to do with how you perceive the act of forcing a mentally ill woman's body into sexual slavery, but I guess I'm not intellectual enough.
no subject
no subject
no subject
So no, I wouldn't say it requires me to refrain from making any kind of moral evaluation (nobody gets off that easy)--but like I said before, it does lead me to second-guess myself (which is extra work that isn't anybody responsibility but my own), and I don't think that's a bad thing.
And while I'm uncertain, it makes sense to me I shouldn't invest too much energy into a position that I might eventually decide to be anti-feminist.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm perfectly willing to accept responsibility for not understanding.
no subject