Episode Reactions in Brief
Oct. 24th, 2009 04:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dollhouse 2x04
Between this and "Epitaph One," I'm really falling in love with Adelle.
Sarah Jane Adventures 3x04
So, has anyone written K-9/Mr. Smith yet?
Between this and "Epitaph One," I'm really falling in love with Adelle.
Sarah Jane Adventures 3x04
So, has anyone written K-9/Mr. Smith yet?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 08:33 pm (UTC)I do think there'd be some question as to whether, if Topher imprinted a truly mentally ill Priya with a manufactured version of herself sans that illness, whether that personality would count as an ensouled person are just be equivalent to another imprint. That'd be on top of the question of how meaningful consent could be when gotten out of an imprint that was, in part, manufactured by Topher in the first place.
It's possible, but not likely, that Adelle could see Priya's illness as a diminishment of her soulfullness.
But again, I think the main reason why asking cured!Priya for consent never occurs to Adelle and Topher is because they firmly see curing her and her becoming a doll as a single act. So the question becomes, is insane!Priya able to consent to her cure (with her becoming a doll a necessary result of being cured). If not, then she's condemned to being insane forever, as far as Adelle and Topher know. So they might see that, in that backwards morality sort of way of theirs, as a humanitarian imperative to loosen the rules somewhat.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 08:38 pm (UTC)Otherwise, I'm not sure we're getting anywhere. I'm sticking with my original, "Adelle thinks stalker's behavior is worse than hers because he's getting something out of it." And maybe also because he conned her into doing something to Priya that she wouldn't have done to a healthy person, and Adelle doesn't like being conned. But as far as turning someone into an active without their consent, the actions are identical.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 10:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 10:38 pm (UTC)I really can't fathom how your own privilege could have anything to do with how you perceive the act of forcing a mentally ill woman's body into sexual slavery, but I guess I'm not intellectual enough.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 11:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 11:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 11:33 pm (UTC)So no, I wouldn't say it requires me to refrain from making any kind of moral evaluation (nobody gets off that easy)--but like I said before, it does lead me to second-guess myself (which is extra work that isn't anybody responsibility but my own), and I don't think that's a bad thing.
And while I'm uncertain, it makes sense to me I shouldn't invest too much energy into a position that I might eventually decide to be anti-feminist.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-26 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 02:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 03:01 am (UTC)I'm perfectly willing to accept responsibility for not understanding.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-10-27 04:40 am (UTC)