Linguistic Descriptivism on ABC News
Oct. 16th, 2007 10:33 pmOnly two minutes long, but a lot of fun: this webcast takes a look at "how idioms get their spellings (and meanings) reshaped into new variants, sometimes to the point of meriting dictionary inclusion" (in the words of interviewee Ben Zimmer, writing on
languagelog here). The pairs it examines include vocal cord/vocal chord, free rein/free reign, and shoe-in/shoo-in.
It involves cartoons (who are, apparently, ventriloquists).
It involves cartoons (who are, apparently, ventriloquists).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 02:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 02:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 03:00 am (UTC)We should totally all be speaking Anglo-Saxon.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 03:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 03:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 03:39 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 03:50 am (UTC)(And I'm being totally disingenuous by holding MW up as an authority, since they also list "alright" as "= all right". Its usage dates from about 75 years after "all right". But I learned the phrase "all right, already" as a mnemonic for spelling these two terms, and will doggedly refuse to use "alright" and mark it as wrong when I beta, and when I see it in a story (fanfic or profic) my opinion of that story drops - more a visceral reaction than anything else.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-17 04:02 am (UTC)But I learned the phrase "all right, already" as a mnemonic for spelling these two terms
I don't follow this. Why couldn't it be "alright, all ready"--that is to say, what about this phrase reminds one that the first word (because you seem to be using it as a single lexeme) has a space in it and the second word does not?