Enter the 'ship: het, gen, and WIP's
May. 17th, 2005 09:44 pmThere's a discussion over at
fanthropology about fandom
identification vs. slasher identification. In a comment,
I argue that:
buffyverse1000--all fall into this category.
( Meta, sort of )
On a related issue, if anyone wants to beta Divine Interventions, I would love them forever.
ETA: I've started a follow-up discussion on longer works and their place in a fandom driven by erotic preference over at
fanthropology. There's quite a good discussion going!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
- When compared to het writers and femslasgers, m/m slashers are more likely to identify primarily as slashers rather than as members of any particular fandom. (Remember I'm talking about trends here. Mileage may vary.)
- Gen writers are even more likely than het writers, femslashers, and m/m slashers to identify primarily as members of fandoms rather than gen writers as such.
- Canon whoredom increases the likelihood of a fan identifying as a member of a particular fandom, since it is indicative of an increased investment in the continuity of that specific fandom.
- Het
writers who identify primarily as het writers rather than members of
particular fandoms are likely to be drawn to fandom by types of
narrative experiences they cannot find in the mainstream, i.e. the soi-disant "queer het."
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
( Meta, sort of )
On a related issue, if anyone wants to beta Divine Interventions, I would love them forever.
ETA: I've started a follow-up discussion on longer works and their place in a fandom driven by erotic preference over at
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)