For the last day or so I've had the incredible urge to put Peter Pevensie in a skirt. Partly I just think he would be hot in a skirt, aesthetically speaking, and that's more than enough reason. But I think there's also a humiliation aspect that's hitting my kinks* (or else why not just put a girl in the skirt?), which is more problematic: finding it humiliating to wear women's clothing is more than a little misogynistic, no? Then again, for a teenage boy during the blitz it'd probably be perfectly in character.
*Yes, I also have an embarrasment squick. When one or the other typically takes over is still something I am trying to theorize. I think it's that I don't want to be embarrassed for them (because they did something stupid, for example), but don't mind them being humiliated if they can be so while still keeping the moral high ground, so to speak. But Belle going into the forbidden wing of the castle in Beauty and the Beast or Pete confronting Mr. Softee in The Adventures of Pete and Pete both had me covering my eyes and ears and/or turning off the television set.
. . .
I saw this post of
mara_sho's, and in particular the icon it uses, and was confused why she was putting her faith in the possibility of a posteriori necessities.
*Yes, I also have an embarrasment squick. When one or the other typically takes over is still something I am trying to theorize. I think it's that I don't want to be embarrassed for them (because they did something stupid, for example), but don't mind them being humiliated if they can be so while still keeping the moral high ground, so to speak. But Belle going into the forbidden wing of the castle in Beauty and the Beast or Pete confronting Mr. Softee in The Adventures of Pete and Pete both had me covering my eyes and ears and/or turning off the television set.
. . .
I saw this post of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)