See, I don't think I would agree that thought is a purely internal experience. Insofar as thought is communication to oneself, it's still communication, and thus necessarily based in language as a system of symbols. Experience qua experience is experiencable, but meaningless. For it to have a meaning (e.g., "get on the bus") there must be language. .
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2008-03-26 02:18 pm (UTC).